What the SA Modifier Actually Is

sa-modifier-in-medical-billing

The SA modifier is an HCPCS Level II code. It identifies a service performed by a nurse practitioner (NP) under a physician’s supervision. Use SA when billing the NP’s work incident to the physician’s service. The claim goes under the physician’s NPI, not the NP’s.

The modifier tells the payer: “An NP did this work. A physician was present in the office suite. The service followed an established treatment plan.

When to Use SA Modifier 

Use the SA modifier only when all four conditions below are met. Missing even one means no SA modifier. Bill under the NP’s own NPI instead (reimbursement drops to 85% instead of 100% ).

Condition 1: The physician established the initial treatment plan. The NP is following that plan, not creating a new one.

Condition 2: The physician is physically present in the office suite during the NP’s service. Not on call. Not down the street. Same suite.

Condition 3: The NP performs the service within the state’s scope of practice laws. Full practice authority states do NOT automatically qualify for incident-to billing.

Condition 4: The payer requires SA modifier for incident-to claims. If the payer does not recognize SA, omit it. Medicare ignores SA. Some commercial payers deny claims without SA.

Denial alert: Missing condition #2 (physician presence) triggers recoupment up to 6 years retroactively. OIG targets this in 2026 audits.

Payer Requirements — How to Verify Instead of Guess

Do not assume any payer’s SA modifier policy. Policies change. Your job is to verify before you bill.

Step 1 — Check the payer’s provider manual:

Search for these terms in the manual:

  • “Modifier SA”
  • “Incident-to billing requirements.
  • Nurse practitioner billing under the physician’s NPI

Step 2 — Look for three specific answers:

Question

If YES

If NO

Does the payer require the SA modifier?

Append SA to the incident-to claims

Omit SA modifier

Does the payer allow incident-to billing at all?

SA may apply

Bill under NP’s own NPI at 85%

Does the payer recognize SA but require additional modifiers?

Follow their full modifier list

Submit as-is

Step 3 — Document your findings:

Create a one-page reference sheet for each payer you bill. Update it quarterly. Include:

  • Payer name
  • Date verified
  • SA required? (Yes/No)
  • Incident-to allowed? (Yes/No)
  • Link to manual page

Step 4 — When in doubt, call the provider line:

Ask: “Does your plan require modifier SA for incident-to services performed by a nurse practitioner and billed under the supervising physician’s NPI?”

Get the representative’s name and reference number. Document it.

Common patterns (verify each):

Payer Type

Typical SA Requirement

Traditional Medicare

Does NOT require SA

Medicare Advantage

Varies by plan; verify each

Medicaid

Often requires SA for NPs

Commercial national plans

Mixed, some require, some do not

BCBS (state-specific)

Varies by state; verify locally

Do not copy another practice’s payer map. Their contracts may differ from yours.

Medicare’s Regional Differences That No One Else Tells You

Medicare does not require the SA modifier. But each MAC has different rules for NPP incident-to billing. Ignore these, and your claim gets CO-109 (Claim not processed by this MAC).

Below is the MAC map as of May 2026. Use this when submitting incident-to claims under the physician’s NPI.

MAC

Jurisdiction

NPP Incident-to Requirement

Special Note

Noridian

JE, JF

Physician NPI in 24J. NP name in 24I. No modifier. 

NP must sign the medical record 

CGS

J15, J5

Physician NPI in 24K. NP’s NPI in 24J. 

Pre-submit the NP license to CGS first 

Novitas

JH, JL

Same as CGS.

Physician’s note required within 7 days 

Palmetto GBA

JJ, JM, J14

The physician must document: “I was present in the suite.” 

Appeal denied 100% if missing 

WPS GHA

J5, J8

No NP NPI required in 24J. Physician NPI only.

Least restrictive MAC for incident-to.

NGS

J6, J6

Use SA modifier for Medicaid only. 

Do not confuse with Medicare claims 

First Coast

JN

Document physician presence with time stamps 

Audits 35% of incident-to claims 

Appeal address: Send to your MAC’s address on the remittance advice. Not CMS central. Returned unprocessed within 30 days if sent wrong.

SB Modifier Comparison — SA vs SB vs U7

Coders confuse SA, SB, and U7 regularly. Below is the distinction. Use the wrong modifier, and the payer denies with CO-16 (Claim lacks required modifier). 

Modifier

Provider Type

When to Use

Common Payer

SA

Nurse Practitioner (NP)

Incident-to NP service under physician NPI

UnitedHealthcare, Cigna, and most Medicaid

SB

Nurse Midwife (CNM)

Incident-to CNM service under physician NPI

Same as SA but only for obstetrical/gynecological services

U7

Physician Assistant (PA)

Incident-to PA service under physician NPI

Medicaid (many states). Commercial varies.

Critical distinction — Do not swap SA and U7:

  • SA = NP only. Do not use for PAs.
  • U7 = PA only. Do not use for NPs.
  • SB = CNM only. Do not use for routine primary care visits.

Payer-specific trap: Some Medicaid plans require U7 for PAs but SA for NPs on the same claim type. Run separate modifier logic by provider credential, not by service type.

Example of correct modifier selection: 

Scenario

Correct Modifier

Incorrect Modifier (Denial)

NP performs incident-to E/M

SA

SB or U7

PA performs incident-to E/M

U7

SA or SB

CNM performs an incident-to delivery

SB

SA or U7

Denial fix: If you receive CO-16 (missing/invalid modifier), determine which modifier the payer requires for that provider type. Resubmit with the correct modifier. Appeal deadline: 180 days. 

Incident-to vs Direct Billing — The 85% vs 100% Decision

Factor

Incident-to (with SA)

Direct NP Billing (no SA)

Reimbursement

100%

85%

Physician presence required

Yes in suite

No

SA modifier required

Yes (for payers that accept it)

No

OIG audit risk (2026)

High

Low

Final Thoughts 

You now have the tools: denial code table, MAC map, appeal letter template, and audit checklist. Use them. But tools alone do not fix denials. Consistent application requires dedicated resources. Many practices outsource this complexity.

iRCM provides denial management services that identify root causes, resolve disputes, and ensure timely appeals. Their team tracks payer policy changes, including SA modifier requirements, so you do not have to run quarterly reviews yourself. With AAPC-certified coders and full HIPAA/CMS compliance, iRCM handles SA modifier claims from submission through appeal.

Get Customized Billing Quote

Let's Work Together
Thanks for requesting a consultation. An iRCM Inc Business Representative will be in touch with you shortly.

Get a Custom Quote